<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New YouTube Channel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lynnharrell.com/2009/11/a-new-youtube-channel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lynnharrell.com/2009/11/a-new-youtube-channel/</link>
	<description>The official website of cellist, Lynn Harrell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 13:45:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: F. Colby</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnharrell.com/2009/11/a-new-youtube-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>F. Colby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 04:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lynnharrell.com/?p=384#comment-504</guid>
		<description>Looking forward to hearing you in Seattle, next year. If I can bring the kids, I will. Nice blog site, Lynn! fc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to hearing you in Seattle, next year. If I can bring the kids, I will. Nice blog site, Lynn! fc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn Harrell</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnharrell.com/2009/11/a-new-youtube-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Harrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 03:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lynnharrell.com/?p=384#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Dear Baroqueboy:

      Thank you for your insights! Most professional string players don&#039;t recognize many of your points. However , I have come to believe that the \modern set-up\ would not have worked at all in the first years of these instruments. I believe also that their power and quality is not achieved out of thin air. the Capacity of the modern sound was always there waiting to develop and mature. In that way it is exactly like the voice ( another parallel !) a young soprano who will become a Christine Brewer, or Zinka Milanov  (two examples of quite differing voices) does NOT sound any way near the way they BECAME.   By working their instruments and their language and style of vocal approach it develops. A singer at twenty may feel that they could tackle Brunnhilde or Aida, and maybe they could-- but at the expense of doing their vocal chords great, irreparable harm. Similarly , the instruments must be played so that the individual character starts to emerge. And gradually they can be &quot;altered&quot; to make more power and brilliance. But the capacity of it was always there. Maybe a better way to describe it is to say that the balance of all 4 strings, of the differing registers and the percentage relationship between resonance and focus is close to perfect acoustically. It has a perfect &quot;voicing&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Baroqueboy:</p>
<p>      Thank you for your insights! Most professional string players don&#8217;t recognize many of your points. However , I have come to believe that the \modern set-up\ would not have worked at all in the first years of these instruments. I believe also that their power and quality is not achieved out of thin air. the Capacity of the modern sound was always there waiting to develop and mature. In that way it is exactly like the voice ( another parallel !) a young soprano who will become a Christine Brewer, or Zinka Milanov  (two examples of quite differing voices) does NOT sound any way near the way they BECAME.   By working their instruments and their language and style of vocal approach it develops. A singer at twenty may feel that they could tackle Brunnhilde or Aida, and maybe they could&#8211; but at the expense of doing their vocal chords great, irreparable harm. Similarly , the instruments must be played so that the individual character starts to emerge. And gradually they can be &#8220;altered&#8221; to make more power and brilliance. But the capacity of it was always there. Maybe a better way to describe it is to say that the balance of all 4 strings, of the differing registers and the percentage relationship between resonance and focus is close to perfect acoustically. It has a perfect &#8220;voicing&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BaroqueboyJF</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnharrell.com/2009/11/a-new-youtube-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>BaroqueboyJF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lynnharrell.com/?p=384#comment-279</guid>
		<description>Please infer no belligerence or anger from this comment, as I mean only to pose a serious question.  Have you ever considered the implications of what must be done to these instruments in order to render them useable as &quot;master&quot; instruments by mainstream string players?  They are carefully pried open, their bass bars and tops shaved down, their necks and fingerboards replaced, their scrolls cut off and re-affixed, and their setups changed to accommodate steel strings.  The result is a beautifully resonant instrument with amazing power and subtly variable tone.  However, their sound as what we would now call a &quot;period&quot; instrument is lost forever, and the intentions of the maker along with it.  Period players have stopped bothering to have such instruments &quot;re-baroqued&quot; because the process rarely yields a superior instrument to a good copy.  Thus, all old instruments which have been modernized may as well be left that way since they work marvelously as modern instruments.  Still, the sound of an old stringed instrument in its original setup is nearly always superior to a modern copy, but this is rarely heard as there are very few instruments from the renaissance and baroque periods which have not been modernized.  I propose that while there is nothing left to do but enjoy the already modified old instruments, there should be some sort of international law or guideline prohibiting any instruments yet to be discovered from being modernized.  I may be biased as a lover of HIP, but I hope that some mainstream classical musicians such as yourself will be on-board with my philosophy regarding old instruments.  What are your views?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please infer no belligerence or anger from this comment, as I mean only to pose a serious question.  Have you ever considered the implications of what must be done to these instruments in order to render them useable as &#8220;master&#8221; instruments by mainstream string players?  They are carefully pried open, their bass bars and tops shaved down, their necks and fingerboards replaced, their scrolls cut off and re-affixed, and their setups changed to accommodate steel strings.  The result is a beautifully resonant instrument with amazing power and subtly variable tone.  However, their sound as what we would now call a &#8220;period&#8221; instrument is lost forever, and the intentions of the maker along with it.  Period players have stopped bothering to have such instruments &#8220;re-baroqued&#8221; because the process rarely yields a superior instrument to a good copy.  Thus, all old instruments which have been modernized may as well be left that way since they work marvelously as modern instruments.  Still, the sound of an old stringed instrument in its original setup is nearly always superior to a modern copy, but this is rarely heard as there are very few instruments from the renaissance and baroque periods which have not been modernized.  I propose that while there is nothing left to do but enjoy the already modified old instruments, there should be some sort of international law or guideline prohibiting any instruments yet to be discovered from being modernized.  I may be biased as a lover of HIP, but I hope that some mainstream classical musicians such as yourself will be on-board with my philosophy regarding old instruments.  What are your views?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

